Author Rating: A

J.D. Salinger has died at age 91.

Mr. Salinger is survived by Ms. O’Neill; his son, Matt; his daughter, Margaret; and three grandsons. His literary agents said in their statement that “in keeping with his lifelong, uncompromising desire to protect and defend his privacy, there will be no service, and the family asks that people’s respect for him, his work and his privacy be extended to them, individually and collectively, during this time.”

“Salinger had remarked that he was in this world but not of it,” the statement said. “His body is gone but the family hopes that he is still with those he loves, whether they are religious or historical figures, personal friends or fictional characters.”

The Catcher in the Rye (1951)

Nine Stories (1953)

  • “A Perfect Day for Bananafish” (1948)
  • “Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut” (1948)
  • “Just Before the War with the Eskimos” (1948)
  • “The Laughing Man” (1949)
  • “Down at the Dinghy” (1949)
  • “For Esmé – with Love and Squalor” (1950)
  • “Pretty Mouth and Green My Eyes” (1951)
  • “De Daumier-Smith’s Blue Period” (1952)
  • “Teddy” (1953)

Franny and Zooey (1961)

Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters and Seymour: An Introduction (1963)

Author Rating: A

Man With One Talent (read 1/22/10) recommended

I borrowed this from the library thinking it was a novel by Graham Greene. Instead what I found was a novel shockingly close to many of today’s issues.

It’s about those with money and power using the fear of “other” to drive the population to work against their own self interest.

We all want to believe that we live in a civilized country, functioning on honorable principles. Unfortunately, the too often untold tale is that since the late 1800s, when workers first began trying to get a fair deal in “the land of plenty,” business interests have worked hard to derail that effort and distract the population with false enemies, pitting “real Americans” against those cast as interloper.

This was published in 1951 and is set in the period from 1930 to 1948.

Author Rating: D

The Memoirs of Cleopatra (read 1/7/10) AVOID

What a huge disappointment! And when I say “huge,” I’m talking 957 pages. Earlier I had attempted Colin Falconer’s appalling When We Were Gods: A Novel of Cleopatra. Wanting to find a better book about the Queen of the Nile, I looked at recommendations over at Amazon. This book was described as being well written and historically accurate.

How bad is this book? There were times that I feared my eyes would literally roll up into my head. I managed to force my way through two-thirds of turgid, often extremely boring prose before I finally gave it up as a serious waste of time.

George’s Cleopatra is certainly more intelligent than Falconer’s but only marginally so. Periods during which Caesar or Marc Anthony are absent go on and on and on with Cleopatra doing nothing but pine and whine about their absence. If these sections had been shortened, the book would be no more than 500 pages. If the sex scenes had been shortened, the book would be about 100 pages.

Reading this book is truly a waste of your time. You can learn more useful information about Cleopatra VII at Wikipedia than by submitting yourself to suffering through the truly excruciating writing of Margaret George.

Author Rating: A+

P.G. Wodehouse (1881-1975) is one of my all-time favorite writers. If I am feeling out of sorts, sitting down with “Plum,” as he was known to his friends and family, never fails to cheer me up.

Since there are so many, I am just going to list the titles I have read. They are all highly recommended.

Psmith, Journalist

Psmith In The City

The Man Upstairs (short stories)

Picadilly Jim

The Inimitable Jeeves

Ukridge

Carry On, Jeeves

The Small Bachelor

Meet Mr. Mulliner

Summer Lightning

Very Good, Jeeves

Big Money

Hot Water

Mulliner Nights (short stories)

Heavy Weather

The Luck of the Bodkins

Laughing Gas

Summer Moonshine

Quick Service

Bertie Wooster Sees It Through

French Leave

Cocktail Time

How Right You Are, Jeeves

Service With A Smile

Stiff Upper Lip, Jeeves

The Brinkmanship of Galahad Threepwood

No Nudes Is Good Nudes

The Girl In Blue

Plum Pie (short stories)

Author Rating: C+

Deadfall (read 12/20/09) Meh

Reading this book was like examining an ancient record of a lost time — the early to mid 1980s. As I got ready to write this review, I did a search for any earlier post mentioning the author and discovered he was already on my banished list as a result of his short story in a very bad anthology of very bad mystery writers. This particular book wasn’t so awful that I stopped reading before the end, but it being relatively short was a significant factor in the decision to continue.

Apparently Pronzini wrote a series of “Nameless Detective” mysteries, this being number sixteen. Nameless is on a stakeout, waiting for some deadbeats to get home so he can repossess their car, when he hears two gunshots coming from a nearby home. He sees a figure running away and, upon entering the house, discovers the victim who he later learns is a gay man named Leonard whose wealthy brother had died falling from a cliff months earlier. Leonard’s “house mate,” who believes the two deaths are related, hires him to find the killer.

Pronzini treats homosexuals as if they are another species. He has no understanding of human sexuality. “Confirmed homosexuals couldn’t be seduced by a woman, of course.”

He is equally clueless about women, ascribing to Nameless’ girlfriend the kind of stupid responses to things that one expects from a man who sees women as a separate species as well.

What also becomes clear in reading this is how much Pronzini disapproves of pot smoking and is one of those misinformed people who insist that it is a “gateway” to heroin.

I’m giving Pronzini a C+ because, if you can ignore the cluelessness and can tolerate caricatures instead of characters, the story itself is plausible.

Author Rating: D

Celtika (read 12/15/09) forget about it

This is the first of Holdstock’s Merlin Codex series. The story covers the period before Arthur. Seven hundred years after Jason’s death, Merlin discovers that Medea had not murdered Jason’s sons but had moved them forward in time. But Jason is not dead, he is still aboard his ship the Argonaut in the bottom of a frozen lake. Merlin rescues him and they set out to find Jason’s sons. It is through this adventure that Merlin first meets Urtha, an ancestor of Arthur, setting the stage for Holdstock’s version of the Arthurian Legend.

I was a bit impatient with the first third of the book but I think that is more my fault than the author’s. I have always found Merlin to be the more interesting character, and Holdstock does a pretty good job of bringing him to life.

The Iron Grail (read 1/18/10) forget about it

Merlin is in Alba (England) and finds Urtha’s stronghold, Taurovinda, has been taken over by ghosts of the dead and not-yet-born while Urtha and Merlin were off avenging the murder of Urtha’s family and to help Jason find his oldest son. Everyone eventually gets back to Taurovinda, the ghosts are cleared out and an expedition is mounted into Ghostland to find Jason’s second son.

The editing could have been much better. There are swaths that are confusing and/or contradictory, and too much that is repetitive. It would have been better had the first two books been combined and the filler left out.

The Broken Kings (read 2/9/10) forget about it

Reality finally came home to roost by page 65 of this, the third book in Holdstock’s “Merlin Coded.” Reading these novels is a complete waste of your time. Endless bullshit that signifies nothing, full of seemingly endless contradiction so that I could take no more and have thrown it over as a bad job.

Holdstock’s Merlin is unengaging, the action so slow and plodding that I couldn’t manage more than three or four pages before passing out.

If you like Arthur/Merlin stories, I highly recommend Peter David’s very humorous series. Now there’s a “living mythmaker.” Holdstock? Meh.

Author Rating: D

Do not confuse this execrable writer with the recommended writer Christopher Moore.

The Risk of Infidelity Index (read 12/8/09) AVOID

I guess the publisher was desperate to find someone willing to say something good about this book to print on the jacket so they looked to another author, T. Jefferson Parker, who damages whatever reputation he might have by declaring that this awful piece of trash is “taut, spooky, intelligent and beautifully written.”

This is a horrible, badly written book that no one should waste their time with. I actually only managed to suffer through to about page 80 when I decided that I had really done nothing so bad in my life that I deserved to suffer through to the end.

I got the book from the library thinking it was by Christopher Moore, a writer who is actually good. It is unfortunate that they have the same name, only distinguished by the hack’s use of the middle initial G (to my mind, “Godawful”). This book could not have been more of a disappointment.

Author Rating: A

Murder At A Police Station (read 12/2/09) recommended

What a wonderful British murder mystery from 1943!

The protagonist is a wanna-be poet/police sergeant named Pork in the little village of Severing who, suffering from toothache and anxious about coming down with the mumps, receives a mysterious phone call from someone who seems to be in trouble. When Sergeant Pork arrives at the house to which he was directed, he finds that he has been the victim of some kind of prank, but when he returns to the police station, there is a man, shot through the heart, laying dead on the floor in the charge room. Pork had locked the doors when he went out and they were still locked when he got back. Who is this man and how did he get here?

Absolutely delightful.

Author Rating: D

When We Were Gods: A Novel of Cleopatra (read 11/24/09) AVOID!

Where to start with how dreadful this book is?

Since the author starts out in the acknowledgment with thanking his editors, perhaps his editors are a good place for me to start. I don’t know what actual services Ayesha Pande and Rachel Kahan provided the author, but it had little to do with actual editing of this book.

Just short of a full printed page comes the first editing oversight — “his” instead of “her” — which a previous reader had corrected. Things go downhill from there. There are many instances in the first 75 pages of misplaced punctuation and confused sentence structure.

I will concede that I have only read to about page 75 but anyone who reads any further has a stronger stomach for stupidity than I have.

When things happen is so confused and contradictory that it’s hard to fix your place in time. The heading for chapter one indicates “fifty-one years before the birth of Jesus Christ.” There are no date headings for chapters two, three or four. Chapter five indicates “forty-eight years before the birth of Jesus Christ.”

Wouldn’t you think that three years had passed? You’d be wrong. Maybe. It’s impossible to know.

The character Cleopatra indicates, in conversation with another character, the passage of one year.

This is a major irritation. It is impossible to know with certainty how old Cleopatra is supposed to be. At chapter one she is 18, but how old is she at chapter five? Nineteen? Twenty-one? Who knows?

But that’s not the only time issue here. The author rambles on with general description but then morphs into narration of a specific event. When did this event occur relative to the last event which had been described? Days? Weeks? Months? Who knows?

Falconer claims to have done “research.” In fact, the back jacket blurb claims, “He travels widely to research his novels.” I wonder whether this “research” wasn’t just intimate weekends with his two editors and his agent, perhaps in Egypt.

The way the character of Cleopatra — central and most important to the book — is set forth is ahistorical. She wonders frequently about “finding love.” WTF?

She is presented as spunky and educated but almost completely passive except when she is literally sucking Caesar’s cock. WTF?

Another ongoing irritation is that a map is provided, not printed in the inside cover by a creative publisher, but on two pages before the text begins, presumably as an aid to the reader. Turns out, not so much. Only two out of every ten locations mentioned are indicated on the map.

I persisted as far as I did because my interest in Egyptian history and the actual Cleopatra had been piqued, but it became obvious that there is nothing historically reliable about this book. It is actually nothing more than a bad romance novel.

Author Rating: A+

The Man In My Basement (read 11/21/09) recommended

What a wonderful book! My only complaint is how well everything works out in the end. Most people like Charles Blakey do not have their lives work out so satisfactorily. I can testify to that. But read this book anyway for the questions it raises about good and evil, justice and morality.

Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned (read 12/10/09) recommended

Wow. Mosley is a terrific writer. This novel is a group of short stories, many of which were originally published in a variety of magazines and other publications, about a man by the name of Socrates Fortlow who is struggling to make sense of the world and his place in it. Mosley provides the reader insight into what it means to be black in America, but it’s more than that. Fortlow’s journey is that of everyman.

Next Page »